Comparing Cases

Facts:Brandenburg, a ku klux klan leader. was convicted of making a speech advocating crime and violence as a means of accomplishing political reform.
issue:was brandenburg’s protected by the first amendment?
holding:yes. the court overruled the conviction because “the constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit a state to forbit advocacy of the use of force or of law violation expect where cuch advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is lekely to incite such action.

This case relates to the past of casey since in the two no damage Advocating terrorism laws that harm the rights and history of using violence causing fear uncertain actions in criminal action.
Because apparently in the case of terrorism occurred casey murder and also attentive to another person without really knowing what was going violated its laws.

280 × 210 – elrepublicanoliberal.blogspot.com
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s